MELAMPAUI OPOSISI BINER: Studi Komparatif Tentang the Third Force, Metaxu, dan the Third Space

Hardiyan Triasmoroadi

Abstract


Oposisi biner merupakan keniscayaan di tengah konteks kontestasi identitas yang mengedepankan adu argumentasi dan kesalingan untuk menguji klaim kebenaran. Dalam rangka merespons oposisi biner, muncul elaborasi-elaborasi teoretis yang berpretensi melampaui oposisi biner, sebagaimana konsepsi Richard Kearney mengenai metaxu, konstruksi Homi K. Bhabha tentang the third space, dan proposal Cynthia Bourgeault perihal the third force. Saya berpendapat bahwa ketiga konstruksi teoretis tersebut mangkus dalam meretas kebuntuan. Dus, saya akan menguraikan dan mengkomparasi ide pokok serta konsepsi kunci dari the third force, metaxu, dan the third space, untuk selanjutnya menyajikan beberapa poin kesimpulan sebagai sebuah kontribusi teoretis dalam mendasari praksis pergerakan yang rindu untuk melampaui oposisi biner.    


Keywords


Oposisi Biner, Binary System, Ternary System; Metaxu; The Third Space; The Third Force

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, eds. The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. London: Routledge, 1995.

Baker, Christopher. “Hybridity and Practical Theology: In Praise of Blurred Encounters.†Contact 149, no. 1 (January 2, 2006): 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13520806.2006.11759030.

———. The Hybrid Church in The City: Third Space Thinking. Ashgate, 2007.

Bhabha, Homi K. “Signs Taken for Wonders: Questions of Ambivalence and Authority under a Tree Outside Delhi, May 1817.†Critical Inquiry 12, no. 1 (October 1985): 144–65. https://doi.org/10.1086/448325.

———. “The Commitment to Theory.†New Formations, no. 5 (1988).

———. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.

Bourgeault, Cynthia. The Holy Trinity and the Law of Three: Discovering the Radical Truth at the Heart of Christianity. Boston & London: Shambhala Publications, 2013.

Foley, Edward. “Eucharist, Postcolonial Theory and Developmental Disabilities: A Practical Theologian Revisits the Jesus Table.†International Journal of Practical Theology 15, no. 1 (January 2011). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijpt.2011.026.

Kearney, R. “What Is Diacritical Hermeneutics?†Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, 2011, 14.

Kearney, Richard. Strangers, Gods, and Monsters: Interpreting Otherness. London & New York: Routledge, 2003.

Kwok, Pui-lan. “Postcolonial Preaching in Intercultural Contexts.†Homiletic (Online) 40, no. 1 (2005): 8–21.

Leander, Hans. “With Homi Bhabha at the Jerusalem City Gates: A Postcolonial Reading of the ‘Triumphant’ Entry (Mark 11.1-11).†Journal for the Study of the New Testament 32, no. 3 (March 19, 2010): 309–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X09357676.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37196/kenosis.v5i1.56

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2019 KENOSIS: Jurnal Kajian Teologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kenosis Telah Terdaftar Pada Situs:

   Psikostudia : Jurnal Psikologi Indexing by :



This work is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright © Kenosis: Jurnal Kajian Teologi 2015-2022. All Rights Reserved.