Memahami Ulang Makna Sosio-Ekologis Abad 21: Kespesiesan Manusia dan Personitas Alam dalam Anthropocene Melalui Actor-Network Theory

Fiktor Jekson Banoet

Abstract


Tendency of the post-positivism sociology family to define the social meaning of humans as a way of living together between humans. The social meaning is drawn from the interactions between them and has not included the associative rules with the ecosphere (biotic and abiotic) as forming the social meaning. And conversely, certain parties, from among scientists, even environmental activists, do not include the definition of the environment as having a "personality". In the midst of the ecological crisis context, this paper tries to re-interpret this meaning socio-ecologically. The goal is to obtain alternatives to respond to the environmental crisis in Indonesia. We conceptualize the perspective of Actor Network Theory, or what is also called Actant Rhizome, by Bruno Latour. He discusses that social meaning is no longer centered on humans and society is no longer human society. Rather, society is any non-human entity in the ecosphere, technosphere and sociophere (human environment) which satisfies the presupposition of interaction, which he calls “active”. For Latour, in an era of ecological crisis, many people will mutate themselves according to that crisis. Theologically, it can then be further reflected in the socio-ecological meaning of society, including the mutated whole.

Abstrak

Kecenderungan rumpun sosiologi pascapositivisme mendefinisikan makna sosial manusia sebagai cara hidup bersama antarmanusia. Makna sosialnya ditarik dari interaksi antara manusia dan belum memasukkan kaidah asosiatif ke dalam ekosfer sebagai pembentuk makna sosial tersebut. Sebaliknya, pihak tertentu, dari kalangan saintis, bahkan pegiat lingkungan kurang memasukan definisi lingkungan hidup sebagai yang memiliki ‘kepribadian’. Di tengah konteks krisis ekologi di Indonesia, tulisan ini mencoba memaknai ulang makna tersebut secara sosio-ekologis. Tujuannya supaya memperoleh alternatif menanggapi krisis lingkungan. Studi ini mempertimbangkan perspektif Teori Jaringan-Aktor (actor-network theory), atau yang juga disebut Actant Rhizome, oleh Bruno Latour. Ia mendiskursuskan bahwa makna sosial tidak lagi berpusat pada manusia dan masyarakat bukan saja masyarakat manusia. Tetapi juga setiap entitas non-manusia dalam ekosfer, teknosfer dan sosiofer yang memenuhi pengandaian interaksi, yang ia sebut ‘aktan’.



Keywords


social meaning, society, socio-ecological, actant, actor network theory.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, Jumal. “Desain Penelitian Analisis Isi (Content Analysis).” Research Gate 5, no. 9 (2018): 1–20.

Ballano, Vivencio. “Epidemiology, Sociology, and the Social Sciences: Evaluating the Philippine Government’s Scientific Response to COVID-19.” 16 /CGP/V16i02/67-80.” The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies 16, no. 2 (2021).

Bergmann, Sigurd. “Climate Change Changes Religion.” Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology 63, no. 2 (December 2009): 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393380903345057.

Capra, Fritjof. The Hidden Connections. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2007.

Ellis, Erle C. Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction. First Edition. Very Short Introductions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Ferdiansyah, Decky. “Co-Evolusi Antibiotik Dalam Pola Penggunaan Antibiotik Menurut Pendekatan Teori Jaringan-Aktor.” Farmasetika.Com (Online) 2, no. 3 (May 25, 2017): 13. https://doi.org/10.24198/farmasetika.v2i3.15889.

Goudge, Elizabeth. My God and My All: The Life of St. Francis of Assisi. Walden, New York: Plough Publishing House, 2015.

Hall, Matthew. Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany. SUNY Series on Religion and the Environment. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011.

Harari, Yuval Noah. Sapiens: Sejarah Ringkas Umat Manusia Dari Zaman Batu Hingga Perkiraan Kepunahannya. Jakarta: Pustaka Alvabet, 2017.

Hart, John. Sacramental Commons: Christian Ecological Ethics. Nature’s Meaning. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher, 2006.

Latour, Bruno. “On Actor-Network Theory. A Few Clarifications, Plus More Than a Few Complications.” Philosophical Literary Journal Logos 27, no. 1 (2017): 173–97. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-173-197.

———. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

———. We Have Never Been Modern. Catherine. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.

Moltmann, Jurgen. Ethics of Hope. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2012.

Rasmussen, Larry L. Earth-Honoring Faith: Religious Ethics in a New Key. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Ritzer, George, and Douglas J. Goodman. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Ketiga. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.

Ritzer, George, and Barry Smart. Handbook Teori Sosial. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2012.

Santmire, H. Paul. The Travail of Nature : The Ambiguous Ecological Promise of Christian Theology (Theology and the Sciences). Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37196/kenosis.v8i2.463

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 KENOSIS: Jurnal Kajian Teologi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kenosis Telah Terdaftar Pada Situs:

   Psikostudia : Jurnal Psikologi Indexing by :



This work is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright © Kenosis: Jurnal Kajian Teologi 2015-2022. All Rights Reserved.