Usaha Menghadapi Kekeliruan Paradigma Ekologis dalam Ensiklik Laudato Si’ Artikel 101-123 dengan Eco-Literacy

Penulis

  • Carel Maximillian Navire Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Teologi Widya Sasana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37196/kenosis.v10i2.844

Kata Kunci:

anthropocentrism, ecology, God, human, nature

Abstrak

The focus of this research is to re-explain ecological problems according to Pope Francis in the encyclical Laudato Si' articles 101-123, explain eco-literacy according to Fritjof Capra, and explain the correlation of eco-literacy theory with the thinking of Pope Francis. This research aims to summarize and clarify the root causes of ecological problems, find out solutions that can help overcome the root causes of ecological damage caused by the wrong human paradigm in looking at nature, and know the principles of environmental ethics based on the relation of the creation story in the Book of Genesis which breaks the anthropocentrism paradigm in utilizing nature. The method used in this research is discourse analysis of Church documents and several other sources. The primary source used is the Encyclical Laudato Si' and secondary sources come from several books and scientific journals that discuss ecological issues. The analysis of some of these sources resulted in research findings that the root of ecological problems is caused by the fallacy of the human paradigm towards nature. The solution presented in this research is eco-literacy that can change the anthropocentric human paradigm into an ecotheocentric one, which is a human perspective towards nature that is oriented towards God, the Creator. Thus, humans no longer see nature as their own, but care for and preserve it for God and the common good.

Keywords: anthropocentrism, ecology, God, human, nature

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Buku:

Capra, Fritjof. The Web of Life: A New Understanding of Living Systems. London: Flamengo, 1997.

Fransiskus, Paus. Ensiklik Laudato Si’, Penterj. P. Martin Harun. Jakarta: Obor, 2015.

Guradini, Romano. The End of The Modern World. Washington: Regnery Publishing, 2001.

Keraf, A. Sonny. Etika Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2002.

Keraf, A. Sonny. Filsafat Lingkungan Hidup: Alam Sebagai Sebuah Sistem Kehidupan Bersama Fritjof Capra. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2014.

McKim, Robert. “Opposing the ‘Technocratic Paradigm’ and ‘Appreciating the Small Things.” dalam Laudato Si’ and The Environment: Pope Franscis’ Green Encyclical. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2019.

Pandor, Pius. Seni Merawat Jiwa Tinjauan Filosofis. Jakarta: Obor, 2014.

Passmore, John. Man’s Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions. New York: Sribner’s, 1974.

Riyanto, Armada. Menjadi-Mencintai: Berfilsafat Teologis Sehari-hari. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2013.

Sugiyono, Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2016.

Suseno, Franz Magnis. Berfilsafat Dari Konteks. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1991.

Tristanto, Lukas Awi. Panggilan Melestarikan Alam Ciptaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2015.

Jurnal Ilmiah:

Adon, Mathias Jebaru, FX Armada Riyanto, and Pius Pandor. “Sumbangan Teologi Penciptaan Kristiani Dalam Ensiklik Laudato-Si Artikel 62-75 Bagi Persoalan Ekologis.” Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup 5, no. 1 (2022): 143–161.

Amirullah. “Krisis Ekologi: Problematika Sains Modern.” Lentera 17, no. 1 (2015): 1–21. https://journal.uinsi.ac.id/index.php/lentera_journal/article/view/425.

Arianto, Arianto, Antonius Denny Firmanto, and Nanik Wijiyati Aluwesia. “Tindakan Ekologis Gereja Katolik Di Indonesia Dari Perspektif Moral Lingkungan Hidup William Chang.” Forum 50, no. 2 (January 3, 2022): 113–150. http://ejournal.stftws.ac.id/index.php/forum/article/view/382.

Guess, Deborah. “An Ecotheological Exploration of the Thought of Arthur Peacocke.” Journal of Anglican Studies 15, no. 2 (November 3, 2017): 188–206. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740355316000279/type/journal_article.

Harun, Martin. “Laudato Si’ and the Environment.” Diskursus Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi STF Driyarkara 18, no. 1 (April 12, 2022): 120–123. https://journal.driyarkara.ac.id/index.php/diskursus/article/view/299.

Keraf, A. Sonny. “Fritjof Capra Tentang Melek Ekologi Menuju Masyarakat Berkelanjutan.” Diskursus Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi STF Driyarkara 12, no. 1 (2013): 54–81.

Kinseng, Rilus A. “Faktor Etika Dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Perikanan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan 4, no. 2 (2017): 175–183.

Longkutoy, Natanael Febryan. “Paradigma Teknokratis: Mengendalikan Atau Dikendalikan Teknologi.” Jurnal Abdiel: Khazanah Pemikiran Teologi, Pendidikan Agama Kristen dan Musik Gereja 6, no. 2 (2022): 179–191.

Ranboki, Buce A. “Menemukan Teologi Leonardo Boff Dalam Ensiklik Paus Fransiskus Laudato Si’.” Indonesian Journal of Theology 5, no. 1 (2018): 42–67.

Senda, Soleman, Dominikus Yordan Taboy, Alfianus Juventus Bria, Rivaldi Bastiano Hani, José Albertino, Marciana Martins, Claudiana Goncalves De Fatima, Judith Luciana Belo, and Augusto Almeida. “Sosialisasi Konsep Ecoliteracy Fritjof Capra Dalam Paroki Oécusse , Timor Leste Dan Penerapannya.” Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin 3, no. 3 (2023): 1–10.

Sutoyo. “Paradigma Perlindungan Lingkungan Hidup [Environmental Protection Paradigm.” Adil Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (2013): 192–206.

Wilantari, N N A. “Pemikiran Fritjof Capra Dalam Ekowisata Hutan Mangrove Desa Adat Kedonganan.” Dharma Duta 20, no. 1 (2022): 69–79. https://www.ejournal.iahntp.ac.id/index.php/Dharma-duta/article/view/827%0Ahttps://www.ejournal.iahntp.ac.id/index.php/Dharma-duta/article/download/827/508.

Yuono, Yusup Rogo. “Etika Lingkungan : Melawan Etika Lingkungan Antroposentris Melalui Interpretasi Teologi Penciptaan Yang Tepat Sebagai Landasan Bagi Pengelolaan-Pelestarian Lingkungan.” Fidei: Jurnal Teologi Sistematika dan Praktika 2, no. 1 (2019): 183–203.

Diterbitkan

2024-10-27

Cara Mengutip

Usaha Menghadapi Kekeliruan Paradigma Ekologis dalam Ensiklik Laudato Si’ Artikel 101-123 dengan Eco-Literacy. (2024). KENOSIS: Jurnal Kajian Teologi, 10(2), 174-193. https://doi.org/10.37196/kenosis.v10i2.844